Introduction. The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830, authorizing the president to grant lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders.
Answer: The Indian Removal Act authorized the President to forcibly remove Native Americans from U.S. Territory. Explanation: The Indian Removal Act was a law adopted on May 28, 1830, which stipulated that the American Indian tribes resident east of the Mississippi River would be moved to areas west of it.
What was the purpose of the Indian Removal Act of 1830?
To achieve his purpose, Jackson encouraged Congress to adopt the Removal Act of 1830. The Act established a process whereby the President could grant land west of the Mississippi River to Indian tribes that agreed to give up their homelands.
What did the Indian Removal Act of 1830 allow what did it not allow?
The law required the government to negotiate removal treaties fairly, voluntarily and peacefully: It did not permit the president or anyone else to coerce Native nations into giving up their land.
What exactly did the Indian Removal Act of 1830 do quizlet?
Law passed by Congress in 1830 and supported by President Andrew Jackson allowing the U.S. government to remove the Native Americans from their eastern homelands and force them to move west of the Mississippi River. Many tribes signed treaties and agreed to voluntary removal.
How did the 1830 Indian Removal Act affect American Indian tribes Brainly?
PLEASE HURRY How did the 1830 Indian Removal Act affect American Indian tribes? A. It forced the government to remove white settlers from tribal lands. … It allowed tribes to choose whether they wanted to leave their lands.
How did the Indian Removal Act Impact America?
While this law enabled the United States to expand their territory and allow U.S. citizens to move further West, this movement of forced relocation angered many Indian tribes who would sometimes resist American forces. … This document seemed to influence most Americans to allow the government to relocate these natives.
Who benefited from the Indian Removal Act?
Most white Americans supported the Removal Act, especially southerners who were eager to expand southward. Expansion south would be good for the country and the future of the country’s economy with the later introduction of cotton production in the south.
Did the Indian Removal Act violate the Constitution?
In 1828, Jackson was elected president. … Jackson backed an Indian removal bill in Congress. Members of Congress like Davy Crockett argued that Jackson violated the Constitution by refusing to enforce treaties that guaranteed Indian land rights. But Congress passed the removal law in the spring of 1830.
What did Andrew Jackson say about the Indian Removal Act?
Jackson declared that removal would “incalculably strengthen the southwestern frontier.” Clearing Alabama and Mississippi of their Indian populations, he said, would “enable those states to advance rapidly in population, wealth, and power.”
How many Native American treaties were broken?
From 1778 to 1871, the United States government entered into more than 500 treaties with the Native American tribes; all of these treaties have since been violated in some way or outright broken by the US government, Native Americans and First Nations peoples are still fighting for their treaty rights in federal courts …
What was the result of the Indian Removal Act quizlet?
The Indian Removal Act was signed into law in 1830. The law granted unsettled lands west of the Mississippi to Native Americans in exchange for their land with pre-existing borders. The treaty traded Cherokee land east of the Mississippi River for $5 million. … about 2,00 U.S. soldiers died.
Which did not occur as a result of the Indian Removal Act?
NOT :The Supreme Court held that Georgia could not take away Cherokee lands. Which did not occur as a result of the Indian Removal Act? New treaties were created with the federal government. … The Cherokee struggled to support themselves in Indian Territory.
How did the Supreme Court interpret the Indian Removal Act?
How did the Supreme Court interpret the Indian Removal Act? Tribes could choose to remain on their lands. Tribes had no right to any land in the new territories. Tribes had to abide by the decisions of the United States.