Several tribes resisted removal, causing conflicts to erupt. Some tribes were forcibly removed, causing distrust for the government. … The Cherokee were forced west along the Trail of Tears years later.
Which did not occur as a result of the Indian Removal Act quizlet?
Which did not occur as a result of the Indian Removal Act? New treaties were created with the federal government. … The Cherokee struggled to support themselves in Indian Territory.
What was one result of American Indian Removal?
During their exodus to Indian Territory, Cherokees lost about a quarter of their population to disease, starvation and hardship.
What was the result of the Indian Removal Act quizlet?
The Indian Removal Act was signed into law in 1830. The law granted unsettled lands west of the Mississippi to Native Americans in exchange for their land with pre-existing borders. The treaty traded Cherokee land east of the Mississippi River for $5 million. … about 2,00 U.S. soldiers died.
How did the Indian Removal Act lead to the Trail of Tears quizlet?
The Indian Removal Act forces the tribes to assimilate into the laws of the settlers. Those who refused were forced northwest by means of the Trail of Tears. Choctaw from Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana were forced to travel to Oklahoma in below freezing temperatures and flooding.
What were the immediate and long term effects of the Indian Removal Act?
2 Immediate Gains and Losses
The terms “Trail of Tears” and “The Place Where They Cried” refer to the suffering of Native Americans affected by the Indian Removal Act. It is estimated that the five tribes lost 1 in 4 of their population to cholera, starvation, cold and exhaustion during the move west.
What was the main purpose of the Indian Removal Act of 1830?
To achieve his purpose, Jackson encouraged Congress to adopt the Removal Act of 1830. The Act established a process whereby the President could grant land west of the Mississippi River to Indian tribes that agreed to give up their homelands.
Why is the Indian Removal Act important?
It gave the president power to negotiate removal treaties with Indian tribes living east of the Mississippi. Under these treaties, the Indians were to give up their lands east of the Mississippi in exchange for lands to the west. Those wishing to remain in the east would become citizens of their home state.
Who benefited from the Indian Removal Act?
Most white Americans supported the Removal Act, especially southerners who were eager to expand southward. Expansion south would be good for the country and the future of the country’s economy with the later introduction of cotton production in the south.
Did the Indian Removal Act violate the Constitution?
In 1828, Jackson was elected president. … Jackson backed an Indian removal bill in Congress. Members of Congress like Davy Crockett argued that Jackson violated the Constitution by refusing to enforce treaties that guaranteed Indian land rights. But Congress passed the removal law in the spring of 1830.
How did the Supreme Court interpret the Indian Removal Act?
How did the Supreme Court interpret the Indian Removal Act? Tribes could choose to remain on their lands. Tribes had no right to any land in the new territories. Tribes had to abide by the decisions of the United States.