Law passed by Congress in 1830 and supported by President Andrew Jackson allowing the U.S. government to remove the Native Americans from their eastern homelands and force them to move west of the Mississippi River. … Resulted from Indians trying to return to their home land led by Chief Black Hawk.
Which of the following was an outcome of the Indian Removal Act?
Introduction. The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830, authorizing the president to grant lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders. A few tribes went peacefully, but many resisted the relocation policy.
What was the result of the Indian Removal Act quizlet?
The Indian Removal Act was signed into law in 1830. The law granted unsettled lands west of the Mississippi to Native Americans in exchange for their land with pre-existing borders. … The result of the refusal of the Seminole Indians to abandon their land in Florida. lasted 7 years.
What was one result of American Indian Removal?
During their exodus to Indian Territory, Cherokees lost about a quarter of their population to disease, starvation and hardship.
What was the main purpose of the Indian Removal Act of 1830?
To achieve his purpose, Jackson encouraged Congress to adopt the Removal Act of 1830. The Act established a process whereby the President could grant land west of the Mississippi River to Indian tribes that agreed to give up their homelands.
Why was the Indian Removal Act important?
It gave the president power to negotiate removal treaties with Indian tribes living east of the Mississippi. Under these treaties, the Indians were to give up their lands east of the Mississippi in exchange for lands to the west. Those wishing to remain in the east would become citizens of their home state.
What was a major reason for the Indian Removal Act of 1830 quizlet?
The Indian Removal Act was a federal law that President Andrew Jackson promoted. Congress passed the law in 1830. Because Congress wanted to make more land in the Southeast available to white settlers, the law required Native Americans living east of the Mississippi River to move west of it.
Which did not occur as a result of the Indian Removal Act quizlet?
Which did not occur as a result of the Indian Removal Act? New treaties were created with the federal government. … The Cherokee struggled to support themselves in Indian Territory.
How did the two tribes attempt to resist the Indian Removal Act?
In a nutshell: the Choctaw were the first to sign a treaty of removal but some tribal members resisted by staying behind under treaty provisions; the Cherokee used legal means to resist removal; the Seminole who considered the treaty of removal illegitimate fought two wars of resistance; the Creek refused to leave …
What were some economic effects of the Indian Removal Act?
Answer and Explanation: Some of the economic effects of the Indian Removal Act of 1830 were the bolstering of the US economy due to high profits from cotton, and detrimental economic effects for Native Americans who were relegated to reservations.
Who benefited from the Indian Removal Act?
Most white Americans supported the Removal Act, especially southerners who were eager to expand southward. Expansion south would be good for the country and the future of the country’s economy with the later introduction of cotton production in the south.
How did the Supreme Court interpret the Indian Removal Act?
How did the Supreme Court interpret the Indian Removal Act? Tribes could choose to remain on their lands. Tribes had no right to any land in the new territories. Tribes had to abide by the decisions of the United States.