You asked: What was the result of the Indian Removal Act of 1830?

In 1830, he signed the Indian Removal Act, which gave the federal government the power to exchange Native-held land in the cotton kingdom east of the Mississippi for land to the west, in the “Indian colonization zone” that the United States had acquired as part of the Louisiana Purchase. …

What was the result of the Indian Removal Act?

The Removal Act paved the way for the forced expulsion of tens of thousands of American Indians from their land into the West in an event widely known as the “Trail of Tears,” a forced resettlement of the Indian population.

What was the Indian Removal Act and what did it result in?

Introduction. The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830, authorizing the president to grant lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders. A few tribes went peacefully, but many resisted the relocation policy.

THIS IS INTERESTING:  Question: Which is the largest ship of Indian Navy?

What was the effect of the Indian Removal Act of 1830 quizlet?

The Indian Removal Act was signed into law in 1830. The law granted unsettled lands west of the Mississippi to Native Americans in exchange for their land with pre-existing borders. The treaty traded Cherokee land east of the Mississippi River for $5 million.

What was the Removal Act of 1830 and what did it accomplish?

To achieve his purpose, Jackson encouraged Congress to adopt the Removal Act of 1830. The Act established a process whereby the President could grant land west of the Mississippi River to Indian tribes that agreed to give up their homelands.

Why is the Indian Removal Act important?

It gave the president power to negotiate removal treaties with Indian tribes living east of the Mississippi. Under these treaties, the Indians were to give up their lands east of the Mississippi in exchange for lands to the west. Those wishing to remain in the east would become citizens of their home state.

Who benefited from the Indian Removal Act?

Most white Americans supported the Removal Act, especially southerners who were eager to expand southward. Expansion south would be good for the country and the future of the country’s economy with the later introduction of cotton production in the south.

How did the Indian Removal Act violate the Constitution?

In 1828, Jackson was elected president. … Jackson backed an Indian removal bill in Congress. Members of Congress like Davy Crockett argued that Jackson violated the Constitution by refusing to enforce treaties that guaranteed Indian land rights. But Congress passed the removal law in the spring of 1830.

THIS IS INTERESTING:  Who was the 1st Chief Justice of India?

What was the main reason why Congress passed the Indian Removal Act?

The Indian Removal Act was a federal law that President Andrew Jackson promoted. Congress passed the law in 1830. Because Congress wanted to make more land in the Southeast available to white settlers, the law required Native Americans living east of the Mississippi River to move west of it.

What was the main purpose of the Indian Removal Act of 1830 quizlet?

Law passed by Congress in 1830 and supported by President Andrew Jackson allowing the U.S. government to remove the Native Americans from their eastern homelands and force them to move west of the Mississippi River. Many tribes signed treaties and agreed to voluntary removal.

How did the Cherokee initially respond to the Indian Removal Act?

How did the Cherokee react to the Indian Removal Act? The Cherokee Nation did not want to be relocated so they took their case to the Supreme Court. … Jackson had disregarded the ruling of the Supreme Court and had ordered the Cherokee to relocate.

How did the Supreme Court interpret the Indian Removal Act?

How did the Supreme Court interpret the Indian Removal Act? Tribes could choose to remain on their lands. Tribes had no right to any land in the new territories. Tribes had to abide by the decisions of the United States.

What did Andrew Jackson say about the Indian Removal Act?

Jackson declared that removal would “incalculably strengthen the southwestern frontier.” Clearing Alabama and Mississippi of their Indian populations, he said, would “enable those states to advance rapidly in population, wealth, and power.”

THIS IS INTERESTING:  Frequent question: How long is the flight from USA to India?